
ResumeWorld
Screening guide
IT resumes carry the longest certification lists in hiring, and certifications are the weakest predictor on them. What separates a strong infrastructure hire is what they did when something was down: whether they owned the incident, found the cause, and changed something so it did not recur. That is the signal a rubric for this function needs to weight above the acronym list.
Signal
Being on the bridge call versus running it. Look for cause found and change made.
Endpoint counts, sites, cloud versus on-premise. These change the job substantially.
Someone who scripted away recurring work is describing a different capability from someone who performed it reliably.
Relevant and current ones are a floor signal. Volume of them is not a ranking signal.
Patch management, access control and incident response experience, weighted to your risk profile.
Noise
None of these is disqualifying on its own. Each is a reason to ask a question rather than assume an answer.
Certification list longer than the experience section
Tooling named with no description of the environment it ran in
No incident or outage described anywhere in an infrastructure history
Support role described entirely as ticket volume
Rubric
Write the criteria down before you look at anyone. An undocumented standard drifts, and it cannot be audited afterwards.
Comparable scale, topology and cloud/on-premise mix.
Evidence of owning an incident through to a durable fix.
Scripting or tooling built to remove recurring manual work.
The specific certifications the role requires, in date.
Experience with the controls regime your environment operates under.
Next step
Ask the same ones of every candidate. Comparability is the whole point.
FAQ
Put it into practice
Work through hundreds of applications per role without the rubric drifting between the first resume and the last.
ExploreScore every application against the role you are actually hiring for, then get a ranked shortlist with the reasoning attached.
ExploreGet a competency signal with the application instead of discovering the gap in the second interview.
ExploreOther roles
Separating engineers who shipped something from engineers who were nearby when something shipped.
Read the guideHigh-volume applicant pools where the differentiating signal is judgement, not tooling.
Read the guideThe function where job titles mean the least and the actual scope varies the most.
Read the guideGo deeper
Most screening criteria are unfalsifiable. How to turn a job description into five to eight requirements you could actually verify from a document.
Read the guideMost hiring delay is queue time, not work time. Find where applications sit waiting, and you can cut weeks without making a single faster decision.
Read the guideKeyword matching is largely gone from modern screening. What to do instead of stuffing, and the four places exact wording still counts.
Read the guideDefine the criteria once, screen every application against them, and get a ranked shortlist with the reasoning attached.